While you might be thinking that Red Dead Redemption fans are clamouring for a third instalment, it’s certainly not a universally agreed upon wish. In fact, some fans controversially think that Rockstar Games should just leave the franchise as it is.
It’s no secret that many fans have hailedRed Dead Redemption 2as being one of thebest-looking gamesout there and one of thebest open-worlds. It does beg the question, couldRockstar Gamespossibly top it? Assumedly, we will end up getting aRed Dead Redemption 3. I can hardly see Rockstar abandoning what is one of the most celebrated gaming franchises. That being said, we have no official news on such a game. Then again, Rockstar is busy cooking upGTA VI. John Marston’s actor diddrop a juicy teasebut some fans are arguing thatRed Dead 3simply isn’t needed.
Take a look at our favouriteRed Dead Redemption 2wins and fails below.
Reddit user ayyLumaowrote, “Unpopular opinion: I thinkRed Dead Redemption 3is entirely unnecessary and shouldn’t be made. Look, I love Red Dead. Both Redemption games are among my favourite games of all time, and I think they’re among the best games ever made, however, we don’t need more. The story wrapped up very nicely in my opinion and I don’t think another prequel about Dutch and Hosea, or Uncle and his Lumbago would be a good idea. Same with a sequel about Jack, especially since WW1 started in the same year thatRDR1ended.”
Advert
Advert
Surprisingly, this user wasn’t alone. “I agree. I think if they craft a phenomenal new story, and enough technological improvements are made to make some really compelling new gameplay, I’d be down. But otherwise,1and2are phenomenal and don’t really need revisiting,” Calibretto9added, while DC1919said, “Same. I think people need to understand that some games hold a snapshot in time.RDR2will always be regarded as one of the best games ever made and I think making sequels dilutes that.” Which side of the fence do you sit on?
Topics:Red Dead Redemption,Rockstar Games,Red Dead Redemption 2
